Evaluating CMR

Imaging Techniques

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Determining Tissue Area or Mass


Page: Go to Previous Page 4 of 8 Go to Next Page

MRI images are normally analyzed using one of two methods: 1) the perimeter of the tissue of interest is traced manually (6, 7), and the area within the perimeter is calculated by multiplying the number of pixels in the region of interest by their known area, or 2) image segmentation algorithms are used to identify all pixels within a selected range of intensities believed to be representative of a specific tissue. However, the latter approach is considered more problematic when applied to MRI images for three reasons: 1) distributions of pixel intensity (greyscale) values for different tissues overlap more for MRI than for CT images, 2) noise due to respiratory motion blurs the borders between tissues in the abdomen to a greater extent in MRI than in CT, and 3) inhomogeneity in the magnetic field can produce shading at the peripheries of MRI images (6).  

With multiple MRI images, tissue volumes can be calculated by integrating cross-sectional area data from consecutive images. Because of the cost of image acquisition and analysis, images are typically collected with gaps between images (usually ranging from 20 to 40 mm), and volumes are then calculated using various modeling equations (3, 4, 8, 9). Tissue densities for adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and organs are fairly constant from person to person, and volume measures for these tissues can be converted to mass units by multiplying the volume by assumed tissue density values (10, 11).   
 


Reference
Previous Reference
Next Reference
3. Ross R, Rissanen J, Pedwell H, et al. Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in men. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 2445-55.
4. Ross R. Magnetic resonance imaging provides new insights into the characterization of adipose and lean tissue distribution. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 74: 778-85.
6. Ross R, Léger L, Morris D, et al. Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables. J Appl Physiol 1992; 72: 787-95.
7. Abate N, Burns D, Peshock RM, et al. Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res 1994; 35: 1490-6.
8. Kvist H, Sjostrom L and Tylen U. Adipose tissue volume determinations in women by computed tomography: technical considerations. Int J Obes 1986; 10: 53-67.
9. Shen W, Wang Z, Tang H, et al. Volume estimates by imaging methods: model comparisons with visible woman as the reference. Obes Res 2003; 11: 217-25.
10. Snyder W.S CMJ, Manssett E.S., Larhansen L.T., Howells G.P., Tipton I.H. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Oxford: Pergamon. 1975.
11. Gallagher D, Belmonte D, Deurenberg P, et al. Organ-tissue mass measurement allows modeling of REE and metabolically active tissue mass. Am J Physiol 1998; 275: E249-58.

Document Center


Managing cardiometabolic risk

Managing cardiometabolic risk

More

Could you comment on the biology of adipose tissue? By Max Lafontan, PhD

Could you comment on the biology of adipose tissue? By Max Lafontan, PhD

More

Waist circumference: Getting it right! By Robert Ross, PhD

Waist circumference: Getting it right! By Robert Ross, PhD

More

Evaluation of the association between the first observation and the longitudinal change in C-reactive protein, and all-cause mortality. Heart 2008;94:457-62

Evaluation of the association between the first observation and the longitudinal change in C-reactive protein, and all-cause mortality. Heart 2008;94:457-62

More

Schematic representation of how smoking might add to several mechanisms linking obesity to cardiovascular disease

Schematic representation of how smoking might add to several mechanisms linking obesity to cardiovascular disease

More