Evaluating CMR

References

1. Heymsfield S.B. LTG, Wang Z., Going S.B. Human Body Composition. Second Edition. Windsor ON. Human Kinetics. 2005.
2. Bray GA, Bouchard C and James WPT, eds. Handbook of obesity. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1998.
3. Brownbill RA and Ilich JZ. Measuring body composition in overweight individuals by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMC Med Imaging 2005; 5: 1.
4. Kim J, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, et al. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 378-83.
5. Genton L, Hans D, Kyle UG, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods. Nutrition 2002; 18: 66-70.
6. Visser M, Fuerst T, Lang T, et al. Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study--Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Body Composition Working Group. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 1513-20.
7. Tylavsky F, Lohman T, Blunt BA, et al. QDR 4500A DXA overestimates fat-free mass compared with criterion methods. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 959-65.
8. Wang W, Wang Z, Faith MS, et al. Regional skeletal muscle measurement: evaluation of new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry model. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 1163-71.
9. Salamone LM, Fuerst T, Visser M, et al. Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 345-52.
10. Levine JA, Abboud L, Barry M, et al. Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in humans: comparison of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 452-6.
11. Snijder MB, Visser M, Dekker JM, et al. The prediction of visceral fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomography and anthropometry. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 984-93.
12. Clasey JL, Bouchard C, Teates CD, et al. The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women. Obes Res 1999; 7: 256-64.
13. Park YW, Heymsfield SB and Gallagher D. Are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry regional estimates associated with visceral adipose tissue mass? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 978-83.
14. Kamel EG, McNeill G, Han TS, et al. Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 686-92.
15. dos Santos RE, Aldrighi JM, Lanz JR, et al. Relationship of body fat distribution by waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasonography to insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment and lipid profile in obese and non-obese postmenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol 2005; 21: 295-301.
16. Bellisari A, Roche AF and Siervogel RM. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17: 475-80.
17. Abe T, Tanaka F, Kawakami Y, et al. Total and segmental subcutaneous adipose tissue volume measured by ultrasound. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 908-12.
18. Abe T, Kondo M, Kawakami Y, et al. Prediction equations for body composition of Japanese adults by B-mode ultrasound. Am J Human Biol 1994; 6: 161-70.
19. Leite CC, Wajchenberg BL, Radominski R, et al. Intra-abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism 2002; 51: 1034-40.
20. Tornaghi G, Raiteri R, Pozzato C, et al. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994; 18: 771-5.
21. Kim SK, Kim HJ, Hur KY, et al. Visceral fat thickness measured by ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 593-9.
22. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra-abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 563-7.
23. Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Azjen S, et al. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1488-94.
24. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17: 209-14.
25. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, et al. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations. Int J Obes 1991; 15: 847-52.
26. Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Kohlmann O, Jr., et al. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension 2001; 38: 713-7.
27. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Harris T, et al. Sagittal diameter minus subcutaneous thickness. An easy-to-obtain parameter that improves visceral fat prediction. Obes Res 1997; 5: 315-20.
28. Liu KH, Chan YL, Chan WB, et al. Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 1267-73.